Curriculum
Why Claivis starts with approved lesson plans
Introduction
Educational technology often promises innovation through open-ended AI models, but classrooms require strict pedagogical alignment. Allowing an ungrounded AI model to generate arbitrary lesson content introduces hallucination risks and curriculum drift.
Claivis addresses this by establishing the school's approved schemes of work as the single source of truth. Every lesson taught by the AI agent originates from verified, reviewed content.
AI teaching needs a deterministic source of truth
A classroom agent becomes unreliable when it invents its own lesson flow. By anchoring the agent to structured lesson plans, educators maintain full control over the pace, depth, and tone of instruction.
“Pedagogical integrity depends on clear boundaries: AI should enhance approved teaching plans, not replace educational standards.”
Human approval keeps educators in total control
The approval workflow ensures that subject heads and department leads inspect every lesson module before it reaches a live classroom display.
- Draft lesson plans remain editable until explicitly approved.
- Only approved modules can be attached to active timetables.
- Regenerating content creates a new reviewable draft without overwriting approved versions.
Connecting timetable schedules to curriculum milestones
Once a lesson plan is approved, it automatically maps to the school timetable. This guarantees that when an AI period launches, it delivers the exact lesson scheduled for that specific day and time.